非常激動的賣家 - 消費者保護
By Bennie
at 2009-07-02T01:26
at 2009-07-02T01:26
Table of Contents
先謝謝Senior提供的法條
剛剛上網查了一下 可能不是很詳細
http://140.117.147.33/gender/laws/3.htm
第260條 解除權之行使,不妨礙損害賠償之請求。
第226條 因可歸責於債務人之事由,致給付不能者,
債權人得請求賠償損害。前項情形,給付
一部不能者,若其他部分之履行,於債權
人無利益時,債權人得拒絕該部之給付,
請求全部不履行之損害賠償。
第 256 條 債權人於有第二百二十六條之情形時,
得解除其契約。
在這邊 要講一下
我明明都是用複製的也沒說我用打的
我去打那段話幹嘛
另外感謝eshew白話解釋 就是不懂才問
還有
之所以對於買賣方棄標廢標還有這案例覺得有問題在於
#16brAwY1 (這篇文章)
並沒有像這次大家這麼踴躍 說要去爭取強制履行合約
(我想噓文的90%都是因為dell才來看此版吧)
才會讓我覺得下標,得標,網拍這部分並沒有強制履行合約
或者是算是完成契約
我也是有先參考前例 才提出我的認知
既然有幾位版友提出比較詳細的看法 我也樂於接受
--
剛剛上網查了一下 可能不是很詳細
http://140.117.147.33/gender/laws/3.htm
第260條 解除權之行使,不妨礙損害賠償之請求。
第226條 因可歸責於債務人之事由,致給付不能者,
債權人得請求賠償損害。前項情形,給付
一部不能者,若其他部分之履行,於債權
人無利益時,債權人得拒絕該部之給付,
請求全部不履行之損害賠償。
第 256 條 債權人於有第二百二十六條之情形時,
得解除其契約。
在這邊 要講一下
我明明都是用複製的也沒說我用打的
我去打那段話幹嘛
另外感謝eshew白話解釋 就是不懂才問
還有
之所以對於買賣方棄標廢標還有這案例覺得有問題在於
#16brAwY1 (這篇文章)
並沒有像這次大家這麼踴躍 說要去爭取強制履行合約
(我想噓文的90%都是因為dell才來看此版吧)
才會讓我覺得下標,得標,網拍這部分並沒有強制履行合約
或者是算是完成契約
我也是有先參考前例 才提出我的認知
既然有幾位版友提出比較詳細的看法 我也樂於接受
--
Tags:
消費者保護
All Comments
By Kelly
at 2009-07-04T01:07
at 2009-07-04T01:07
By Anthony
at 2009-07-07T10:26
at 2009-07-07T10:26
By Liam
at 2009-07-10T05:29
at 2009-07-10T05:29
By Quanna
at 2009-07-10T07:58
at 2009-07-10T07:58
By Callum
at 2009-07-14T04:20
at 2009-07-14T04:20
By Selena
at 2009-07-14T18:31
at 2009-07-14T18:31
By Caroline
at 2009-07-18T12:59
at 2009-07-18T12:59
By Valerie
at 2009-07-22T02:26
at 2009-07-22T02:26
By Andrew
at 2009-07-25T22:46
at 2009-07-25T22:46
By Caroline
at 2009-07-29T22:01
at 2009-07-29T22:01
By Quanna
at 2009-07-30T03:24
at 2009-07-30T03:24
By Edith
at 2009-08-03T19:55
at 2009-08-03T19:55
By Kristin
at 2009-08-04T05:02
at 2009-08-04T05:02
By Todd Johnson
at 2009-08-08T11:06
at 2009-08-08T11:06
By Thomas
at 2009-08-12T06:25
at 2009-08-12T06:25
By Todd Johnson
at 2009-08-15T11:09
at 2009-08-15T11:09
By Necoo
at 2009-08-15T22:51
at 2009-08-15T22:51
By Yuri
at 2009-08-20T16:28
at 2009-08-20T16:28
By Necoo
at 2009-08-21T01:41
at 2009-08-21T01:41
By Iris
at 2009-08-24T20:31
at 2009-08-24T20:31
By Rae
at 2009-08-25T15:16
at 2009-08-25T15:16
By Puput
at 2009-08-28T01:57
at 2009-08-28T01:57
By Ethan
at 2009-08-30T17:36
at 2009-08-30T17:36
By Hedy
at 2009-09-03T05:25
at 2009-09-03T05:25
By Frederic
at 2009-09-07T19:00
at 2009-09-07T19:00
By Hedwig
at 2009-09-09T21:11
at 2009-09-09T21:11
By Christine
at 2009-09-09T23:36
at 2009-09-09T23:36
By Bethany
at 2009-09-13T02:44
at 2009-09-13T02:44
Related Posts
Re: [新聞] 戴爾錯標事件 消保會密切觀察
By Tom
at 2009-07-02T00:13
at 2009-07-02T00:13
非常激動的賣家
By James
at 2009-07-01T23:49
at 2009-07-01T23:49
非常激動的賣家
By Enid
at 2009-07-01T22:21
at 2009-07-01T22:21
發現戴爾公司訂單聲明的重大陷井
By Donna
at 2009-07-01T22:19
at 2009-07-01T22:19
發現戴爾公司訂單聲明的重大陷井
By Genevieve
at 2009-07-01T22:04
at 2009-07-01T22:04