消基會：戴爾事件 消費者勝訴機率大 - 消費者保護
By Madame
at 2009-07-07T21:06
at 2009-07-07T21:06
Table of Contents
※ 引述《spaceranger (GUCCI0806)》之銘言：
: 「消費者面對的是機器，不是人，」吳旭洲表示。因此即便消費者收到了確認文件，都是
: 由系統自動發出。而不是真正的當事者。他認為，這不構成互相表示意思一致的原則。因
: 為絕非廠商原意。
我只針對這點提出疑問:
如果說機器沒有締約權,那自動販賣機還能用嗎? 我投了十塊錢下去,拿走飲料,
結果廠商能夠以 "對不起我標錯價格,我一開始就沒有要賣你這種價格所以買賣無效"
跟你討回飲料嗎?
尤其是現在電子化的自動/半自動銷售與服務這麼多,豈不是通通可以這樣主張?
很多還不是實體貨品買賣的,如果是這樣,那天下會大亂,這些學者腦袋裡面裝的
都是些什麼東西啊?
----
我只想說,既然意思不一致,那你跟我討錢幹什麼? 討打吧?
--
Tags:
消費者保護
All Comments
By Genevieve
at 2009-07-09T10:13
at 2009-07-09T10:13
By Catherine
at 2009-07-09T22:18
at 2009-07-09T22:18
By Steve
at 2009-07-12T09:50
at 2009-07-12T09:50
By Joseph
at 2009-07-17T05:00
at 2009-07-17T05:00
By Oscar
at 2009-07-20T12:03
at 2009-07-20T12:03
By Brianna
at 2009-07-25T03:54
at 2009-07-25T03:54
By Brianna
at 2009-07-25T11:58
at 2009-07-25T11:58
By Robert
at 2009-07-28T11:00
at 2009-07-28T11:00
By Lydia
at 2009-08-02T08:34
at 2009-08-02T08:34
By Zanna
at 2009-08-06T07:37
at 2009-08-06T07:37
By Quintina
at 2009-08-09T19:02
at 2009-08-09T19:02
By Dinah
at 2009-08-12T00:29
at 2009-08-12T00:29
By Valerie
at 2009-08-14T00:45
at 2009-08-14T00:45
By James
at 2009-08-18T01:12
at 2009-08-18T01:12
By Lauren
at 2009-08-22T17:46
at 2009-08-22T17:46
By Erin
at 2009-08-25T05:37
at 2009-08-25T05:37
By Puput
at 2009-08-30T01:10
at 2009-08-30T01:10
By Charlotte
at 2009-09-03T06:30
at 2009-09-03T06:30
Related Posts
使用信用卡付呆兒貨款的,可以參考一下這篇
By Todd Johnson
at 2009-07-07T20:31
at 2009-07-07T20:31
寄發存證信函
By Edith
at 2009-07-07T20:09
at 2009-07-07T20:09
消基會：戴爾事件 消費者勝訴機率大
By Mia
at 2009-07-07T19:44
at 2009-07-07T19:44
關於 Dell 的款項提存
By Adele
at 2009-07-07T19:41
at 2009-07-07T19:41
我是筆電團的，還沒匯款
By Brianna
at 2009-07-07T19:16
at 2009-07-07T19:16